Opinion

Brown v. Blount's Exterminating Co., Inc.

  • 694 So. 2d 8
  • 1997 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 231
  • 1997 WL 127232
Court
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Mar 21, 1997
Status
Published
Author
Crawley
On the bench
Monroe, Robertson, Yates, Crawley, Thompson
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

CRAWLEY, Judge,

dissenting.

I dissent because the Browns failed to submit substantial evidence in opposition to the exterminator’s motion for summary judgment. Mrs. Brown’s deposition testimony and her brother’s affidavit did not contain substantial evidence (1) that the damage to the porch was caused by termites and (2) as required by the terms of the termite bond contract, that “[the] new termite damage [was] found (where termites are alive) during [annual] reinspection.” Rule 56(e)(3), Ala. R.Civ.P.

THOMPSON, J., concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.