Opinion

Crump v. Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

  • 678 So. 2d 140
  • 1996 Ala. LEXIS 149
  • 1996 WL 305656
Court
Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed
Jun 7, 1996
Status
Published
Author
Maddox
On the bench
Ingram, Hooper, Almon, Shores, Cook, Butts, Maddox, Houston, Kennedy
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.5%

$1000 fine constituted punishment in view of punitive purpose underlying ABC penalties

How later courts described this case

  • $1000 fine constituted punishment in view of punitive purpose underlying ABC penalties

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

MADDOX, Justice

(dissenting).

I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to deny the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board’s petition for writ of certiorari. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is in direct conflict with this Court’s opinion in Ex parte State of Alabama Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., 654 So.2d 1149 (Ala.1994), as well as the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435 , 109 S.Ct. 1892 , 104 L.Ed.2d 487 (1989). I agree with the analysis set forth in the dissenting opinion of Judge Crawley. Furthermore, Judge Thigpen in his dissent correctly interpreted Ex parte State of Alabama Alcoholic Bev. Control Bd., supra. Therefore, I would grant certiorari review, and I would reverse the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, on the grounds set forth in those dissents.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.