Opinion

American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio v. Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board

  • 222 F.3d 268
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 16276
  • 2000 WL 1016751
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Filed
Jul 14, 2000
Status
Published
On the bench
Martin, Merritt, Boggs, Norris, Suhrheinrich, Siler, Batchelder, Daughtrey, Moore, Cole, Clay, Gilman
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 92.9%

granting rehearing en banc, and noting that “the effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court.”

How later courts described this case

  • granting rehearing en banc, and noting that “the effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellants file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, August 14, 2000 and the appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, September 15, 2000.

The Clerk will schedule this case for argument as directed by the court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.