Opinion

School Board of Hillsborough County v. Lara

  • 667 So. 2d 368
  • 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12480
  • 1995 WL 697275
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Nov 27, 1995
Status
Published
On the bench
Barfield, Davis, Zehmer
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 58.0%

The opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

The School Board of Hillsborough County appeals an adverse final order of a judge of compensation claims, and appellee moves to dismiss, arguing that the appellants have failed to post the bond required by section 440.25(5)(c), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1994), or demonstrate an entitlement to exemption from that requirement. We conclude that application of this statutory bond requirement to the School Board is in conflict with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(b)(2), which provides that the filing of a notice of appeal by a public body operates as an automatic stay pending review. The *369 Committee Notes to Rule 9.310 make clear that the rule provides for an automatic stay without bond, and to the extent the statutory bond requirement is in conflict with Rule 9.310(b)(2), the rule must control. City of Jacksonville Beach v. Public Employees Relations Commission, 359 So.2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Accordingly, we hold that the bond requirement of section 440.25(5)(c) does not apply to public bodies entitled to the benefit of the automatic stay provision of Rule 9.310(b)(2),, and we therefore deny the motion to dismiss.

MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED.

ZEHMER, C.J., and BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.