explaining that: “A ‘genuine issue’ is a ‘triable issue.’ More Imprecisely, ‘[a]n issue is genuine - if reasonable persons could disagree.’ ”
How later courts described this case
- explaining that: “A ‘genuine issue’ is a ‘triable issue.’ More Imprecisely, ‘[a]n issue is genuine - if reasonable persons could disagree.’ ”
- holding that a | %de novo standard applies in reviewing a trial court’s decision granting summary judgment
- robbery and fear of imminent sexual abuse
- “affidavits ... questioning the propriety of the disciplinary action do not support the allegations of bad faith and malice; they simply question the medical judgment upon which the disciplinary action was based”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
LEMMON, Judge,
concurring.
However, once the individual staff members and doctors are dismissed by summary judgment based on the immunity conferred by La. 13:3715.3C, the corporate defendants who acted through the released individuals may be entitled to summary judgment on other grounds. Rehearing applicants may raise the issue by another motion for summary judgment.