Opinion

Brown v. State

623 So. 2d 867
1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9432
1993 WL 355193

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed: Sep 17, 1993
Status: Published
Author: Diamantis
On the bench: Diamantis, Griffin, Harris
Cited by: 0 cases
Authority: More cited than 0.2%

The opinion

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

Anthony Brown challenges the legality of his sentence, claiming that the trial court erred in computing his sentencing guidelines scoresheet because the court utilized a multiplier in assessing legal constraint points. See Flowers v. State, 586 So.2d 1058 (Fla.1991). We conclude that this matter must be remanded to the trial court for a hearing because the instant record does not contain the pertinent documents concerning the sentence which was imposed following an earlier reversal by this court. Brown v. State, 581 So.2d 242 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

VACATED; REMANDED for a hearing.

HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.