Opinion

Ramsey v. Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar

621 So. 2d 1319
1993 Ala. LEXIS 569
1993 WL 196245

Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
Filed: Jun 11, 1993
Status: Published
Author: Adams
On the bench: Adams, Hornsby, Shores, Houston, Ingram
Cited by: 0 cases
Authority: More cited than 0.2%

The opinion

ADAMS, Justice.

Richard H. Ramsey III appeals from a 45-day suspension from the practice of law imposed by the Disciplinary Board of the Alabama State Bar. We affirm.

Mr. Ramsey was charged with violating DR 1-102(A)(4), (5), and (6), and he was found guilty on all three counts. After carefully considering the arguments of both parties and thoroughly examining the record on appeal, we conclude that the order of the Disciplinary Board is due to be affirmed on the authority of Noojin v. Alabama State Bar, 577 So.2d 420 (Ala.1990).

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and SHORES, HOUSTON and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.