holding that, given the presumption of correctness of the trial court's ruling, where no transcript is provided to appellate court, then appellate court is unable to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion
How later courts described this case
- holding that, given the presumption of correctness of the trial court's ruling, where no transcript is provided to appellate court, then appellate court is unable to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150 , 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that, given the presumption of correctness of the trial court's ruling, where no transcript is provided to appellate court, then appellate court is unable to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion).