Opinion

Brown v. Dealers Insurance Co.

  • 595 So. 2d 1118
  • 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4474
  • 1992 WL 69039
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Apr 8, 1992
Status
Published
Author
Shivers
On the bench
Miner, Shivers, Wolf
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

SHIVERS, Judge.

We affirm that portion of the trial court’s Final Judgment in favor of Dealers Insurance Company (Dealers) and Florida Managing General Agency, Inc., # 555, entered on the verdict of the jury on the claim of Daniel P. Brown. As to Brown’s claim against Betty C. Kirkpatrick, d/b/a Kirkpatrick Insurance Agency, we find that the questions were properly submitted to the jury, and we reverse the judgment non *1119 obstante veredicto and direct that the jury verdict in favor of Brown and against Kirkpatrick be reinstated and judgment in favor of Brown and against Betty C. Kirkpatrick d/b/a Kirkpatrick Insurance Agency be entered thereon. In view of our disposition, it is unnecessary to reach the issues raised by Dealers on cross-appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions.

MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.