Opinion

Hunt v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners

  • 558 So. 2d 156
  • 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1720
  • 1990 WL 26689
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Mar 14, 1990
Status
Published
On the bench
Barfield, Ervin, Wentworth
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 75.1%

The opinion

ORDER ON MOTION FOR STAY

PER CURIAM.

Appellant files a motion to stay the final order of the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners (Board), pending this appeal. We deny the motion for stay.

The final order of the Board, among other things, placed appellant’s license on probation for two years with specific restrictions. In support of his motion for stay pending appeal, appellant cites to Section 120.68(3), Florida Statutes, which states that “if the agency decision has the effect of suspending or revoking a license, super-sedeas shall be granted as a matter of right....” The final order of the Board neither suspended nor revoked the appellant’s license, accordingly, the automatic stay provision of Section 120.68(3), is not applicable. The motion for stay is denied.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.