Opinion

Polk v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development

  • 538 So. 2d 239
  • 1989 La. LEXIS 105
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Jan 30, 1989
Status
Published
Author
Watson
On the bench
Calogero, Cole, Reasons, Watson
Cited by
8 cases

The opinion

WATSON, Justice,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in the conclusion that the State is indebted to the plaintiff for replacement housing benefits, but I dissent from the quantum reduction. If Mrs. Polk is entitled to anything, and the majority concludes correctly that she is, she is entitled to the amount awarded by the trial court and affirmed by the court of appeal.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.