Frix
Try Donna

Opinion

Jones v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Acupuncture

  • 13 Fla. L. Weekly 866
  • 524 So. 2d 700
  • 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1477
  • 1988 WL 31714
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Apr 6, 1988
Status
Published
On the bench
Ervin, Nimmons, Smith
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 26.5%

if the instructions to a portion of the acupuncture examination are misleading and insufficient, the remedy is to allow those persons who failed the exam due to the misleading instructions to retake that portion of the examination

How later courts described this case

  • if the instructions to a portion of the acupuncture examination are misleading and insufficient, the remedy is to allow those persons who failed the exam due to the misleading instructions to retake that portion of the examination

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cf. Alvarez v. Department of Professional Regulation, 458 So.2d 808 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (if the instructions to a portion of the acupuncture examination are misleading and insufficient, the remedy is to allow those persons who failed the exam due to the misleading instructions to retake that portion of the examination).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, C.J., and ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.