Opinion

In re Schneckenburger

  • 518 So. 2d 497
  • 1988 La. LEXIS 126
  • 1988 WL 1917
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Jan 18, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Lemmon
On the bench
Cole, Dennis, Dixon, Lemmon, Marcus, Reasons
Cited by
3 cases

The opinion

LEMMON, Justice,

concurring in the denial of rehearing.

Respondent was prohibited by R.S. 42:llll(C)(2)(d), not from selling real estate to a person who would be required to obtain a building permit from the public servant’s agency, but from selling real estate to a “person (who) conducts operations or activities which are regulated by the public employee’s agency”. If respondent’s vendee had been a school teacher or a policeman (instead of a building contractor whose business operation was regularly inspected for permits and codal compliance by respondent's agency), there would have been no violation. 1

. The dissent points out that issuance of building permits is a purely ministerial duty. However, the agency’s primary regulatory duties involved inspections of ongoing and completed construction to ensure compliance with applicable building and zoning codes, and these duties entailed considerable discretion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.