despite receipt of two letters from a doctor who asked HRS whether he should continue treating certain patients since he was not board certified, HRS continued to pay the doctor during the next two years without ever responding to his letter
How later courts described this case
- despite receipt of two letters from a doctor who asked HRS whether he should continue treating certain patients since he was not board certified, HRS continued to pay the doctor during the next two years without ever responding to his letter
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
On Motion for Rehearing
PER CURIAM.
The panel 1 adopts the dissenting opinion of Chief Judge Schwartz as the view of this court. Accordingly, the order under review is reversed.
. This case was argued before the entire court pursuant to an order granting rehearing en banc. The instant panel decision necessarily effects the vacation of that order.