Opinion

Pelham v. School Board of Wakulla County

  • 451 So. 2d 1004
  • 18 Educ. L. Rep. 504
  • 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13575
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Jun 15, 1984
Status
Published
On the bench
Mills, Nimmons, Smith
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 26.1%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of prohibition and the response thereto, we find that petitioner has shown a “well-grounded fear that he will not receive a fair [hearing] at the hands of the [respondent agency.]” Sikes v. Seaboard Coastline RR Co., 429 So.2d 1216, 1224 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). The petition for writ of prohibition is therefore granted, and the members set forth in the petition are disqualified from participating in the hearing on the amended recommended order entered below on October 12, 1983. Within 10 days of the date of the order entered herein April 5, 1984, respondent shall make application to the Governor, pursuant to Section 120.71, Florida Statutes (1983), for appointment of a sufficient number of persons to respondent school board so that a quorum will be present at the hearing on the recommended order, such hearing to be set within 30 days of the date of that appointment. 1

MILLS, SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

. This writ was granted by order of April 5, 1984. This opinion follows.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.