Opinion

Bala v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medical Examiners

  • 438 So. 2d 113
  • 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24306
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Sep 14, 1983
Status
Published
On the bench
Han, Hobson, Ryder
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 26.0%

The opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for rehearing, we deny the motion, but withdraw our earlier opinion and substitute the following revised decision in its place:

Clemente Bala, Jr., M.D., appeals an order of the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medical Examiners, revoking his license to practice medicine in the State of Florida. We affirm.

Bala raises three points on appeal. We reject all three. With respect to point one, see Schomer v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Optometry, 417 So.2d *114 1089 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). As to point two, the Board, although apparently having considered matters at the hearing not supported by the evidence of record, issued an order which is supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. In other words, the order does not depend on any finding of fact that is not supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. Point three is without merit.

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and LE-HAN, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.