holding that provisions of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with conclusion reached in Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 79-109 (1979). 4 Section 112.061 (11)(b
How later courts described this case
- holding that provisions of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with conclusion reached in Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 79-109 (1979). 4 Section 112.061 (11)(b
- holding that the provisions of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with conclusion in Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 79-109
- holding that the provision of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with conclusion in Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 79-109
- holding that the provisions of a county ordinance authorizing assessment of penalties by a county agency was unconstitutional, and agreeing with the conclusion reached in AGO 79-109
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ANSTEAD, Judge,
specially concurring:
The only argument made by the county in defense of its ordinance in the trial court was that the subsequent act of the legislature authorizing the county to enact a consumer protection ordinance complete with penalties, somehow validated the original ordinance. I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the county’s assertion is without merit.