Opinion

In the Interest of R. J. B. v. State

  • 408 So. 2d 1048
  • 1982 Fla. LEXIS 2322
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Jan 14, 1982
Status
Published
Author
Sundberg
On the bench
Adkins, Alderman, Boyd, McDonald, Overton, Sundberg
Cited by
29 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.9%

holding that only the supreme court is permitted to decide when interlocutory orders may be appealed

How later courts described this case

  • holding that only the supreme court is permitted to decide when interlocutory orders may be appealed
  • where juvenile attempted to appeal interlocutory order in juvenile criminal case, court specifically noted it had the authority to allow such an appeal, but had declined to do so

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SUNDBERG, Chief Justice,

dissenting:

For the reasons expressed in G. A. v. State, 391 So.2d 720 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), I would approve that decision and disapprove the decision in the instant cases.

ADKINS, J., dissents and concurs with SUNDBERG, C. J.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.