Opinion

South Florida Regional Planning Council v. Board of County Commissioners of Palm Beach County

  • 372 So. 2d 1142
  • 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14917
Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Filed
Jun 20, 1979
Status
Published
Author
Letts
On the bench
Beranek, Downey, Letts
Cited by
7 cases

a particular contractual provision which required payment by one party to the other was found to not provide for damages and, therefore, to not be a penalty

How later courts described this case

  • a particular contractual provision which required payment by one party to the other was found to not provide for damages and, therefore, to not be a penalty

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

LETTS, Judge,

dissenting:

I dissent.

The majority agrees that the Bruce Builders rationale calls for equity to provide the relief. On what basis should equity assist here? The Board’s action was an arbitrary breach of a written contract which we now hold did not contain a penalty clause. I would not call on equity to help cleanse such unclean hands.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.