Opinion

Washington v. St. Charles Parish School Board

  • 274 So. 2d 909
  • 1973 La. App. LEXIS 5796
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Feb 6, 1973
Status
Published
On the bench
Boutall, Redmann, Stoulig
Cited by
4 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.2%

Reversed on other grounds by Washington v. St. Charles Parish School Board, 1974 La. LEXIS 3241 (1974)

The opinion

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

After the original opinion in this case was delivered, defendant-appellant, St. Charles Parish School Board, filed an application for rehearing, and, for the first time, a plea of prescription based upon Article 3538 of the Louisiana Civil Code. This plea cannot be considered for the reason that it is filed too late. Under LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2163 we cannot consider the peremptory exception filed for the first time in this court if it is pleaded after submission of the case for a decision. Braswell v. Heartwell, 234 So.2d 197 (La.App. 2nd Cir. 1970); Steib v. Joseph Rathborne Land Company, 163 So.2d 429 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1964).

Appellant’s application for a rehearing is denied.

Rehearing denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.