defendant could not complain of error in converting temporary injunction to permanent injunction without proof of irreparable injury when defendant stipulated that court could enter final judgment based on the record of temporary injunction proceedings
How later courts described this case
- defendant could not complain of error in converting temporary injunction to permanent injunction without proof of irreparable injury when defendant stipulated that court could enter final judgment based on the record of temporary injunction proceedings
- titles to legislative acts may be examined and considered in order to determine the legislative intent
- legislative intent is gleaned from the judicial practice of examining the title of a given act
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
PEARSON, Chief Judge
(concurring in part and dissenting in part).
I agree that the injunctive order is too broad and that this court properly struck the portion of the order specified. I do not agree that the action of the legislature in repealing the statewide requirement for a teacher to take and pass the N.T.E. with a minimum score constitutes a legislative prohibition upon the use of that examination by local school authorities. The courts ought not attribute to the legislature an intent beyond that expressed. State ex rel. Davis v. Knight, 98 Fla. 891 , 124 So. 461 (1929).