Opinion

Board of Trustees of the Firemen's Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New Orleans

  • 217 So. 2d 769
  • 1969 La. App. LEXIS 5416
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Jan 6, 1969
Status
Published
Author
Regan
On the bench
Barnette, Johnson, Regan
Cited by
3 cases
Authority
More cited than 84.7%

The opinion

REGAN, Judge.

The plaintiffs, Board of Trustees of the Firemen’s Pension and Relief Fund of the City of New Orelans, filed this petition and a rule for mandamus against the City of New Orleans, the Council of the City of New Orleans, and its members, John J. *770 Petre, Maurice A. Landrieu, Henry B. Curtis, Eddie Sapir, Clarence O. Dupuy, James A. Moreau, and Philip C. Ciaccio, endeavoring to compel them to appropriate the sum of $66,577.46 in order to pay a 2% cost of living increase in pension funds to retired firemen for the period of July 1, 1967, through December 31, 1967, in conformity with the provisions of an amendment to La.R.S. 33:2117.

The defendants answered and pleaded the exceptions of no right or cause of action, prematurity and lack of capacity to ■sue. They then admitted that the 2% cost of living increase was to be effective as of January 1, 1968, but they denied its effectiveness between the dates of July 1, 1967, and December 31, 1967, and they concede that they have refused to appropriate funds for that period.

Judgment was rendered overruling the exceptions and a writ of mandamus was issued ordering the defendants to appropriate the sum of $66,577.46 for payment of increased benefits for the period between July 1, 1967, through December 31, 1967, subject to a credit for any deaths which may have occurred during that period.

From that judgment, the defendants have prosecuted this appeal.

This case was consolidated with Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Pension and Relief Fund of City of New Orleans v. City of New Orleans, La.App., 217 So.2d 766 . That suit was filed subsequent to the present suit for the purpose of joining as parties plaintiff individual firemen in order to cure the defendants’ exception of lack of capacity of the Board to sue, and the issues are identical with those of the present suit.

For the reasons assigned therein, the judgment of the lower court ordering the defendants to appropriate the sum of $66,-577.46 for the period between July 1, 1967, through December 31, 1967, is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.