Opinion

Adolph v. Sewerage & Water Board Pension Committee

  • 202 So. 2d 664
  • 1967 La. App. LEXIS 4970
Court
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed
Jul 17, 1967
Status
Published
On the bench
Hall, Regan, Samuel
Cited by
11 cases

The opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In their application for a rehearing plaintiffs Harvey and Adolph contend they did not “freely choose” not to retire before the 1957 coordinated plan went into effect.

We find our opinion could give that impression and the record does not support such a finding. However, the matter is immaterial. These two plaintiffs knew, or should have known, of the proposed social security payment deductions under the new plan and, according to their own testimony, they also knew they could have retired prior to the time the new plan went into effect.

The application for a rehearing is refused.

Rehearing refused.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.