Opinion

Dixon v. Dixon

  • 194 So. 2d 897
  • 1967 Fla. LEXIS 4125
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Feb 1, 1967
Status
Published
On the bench
Connell, Drew, Roberts, Thomas, Thornal
Cited by
11 cases
Authority
More cited than 85.4%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this court. We issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon consideration of the petition, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the petition is denied and the writ discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, J., dissents with Opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.