Opinion

Hall v. Hanford

  • 64 So. 2d 303
  • 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1188
Court
Supreme Court of Florida
Filed
Apr 7, 1953
Status
Published
Author
Roberts
On the bench
Drew, Hobson, Mathews, Roberts, Sebring, Terrell, Thomas
Cited by
10 cases

concluding that when the complaint is dismissed, there is nothing before the court upon which a temporary injunction can issue

How later courts described this case

  • concluding that when the complaint is dismissed, there is nothing before the court upon which a temporary injunction can issue

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ROBERTS, Chief Justice

(dissenting).

In my opinion an order dismissing the bill with the right to amend continues the litigation until the period for amendment expires. The floating jurisdiction during such period is adequate to support a continuance of the temporary injunction particularly where a bond had been posted.

DREW, J., concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.