holding that the appellant’s conviction for capital murder was proper under either of two theories because the evidence supported determinations that he acted as both a principal in the first degree and a principal in the second degree
How later courts described this case
- holding that the appellant’s conviction for capital murder was proper under either of two theories because the evidence supported determinations that he acted as both a principal in the first degree and a principal in the second degree
- holding that an unsignaled lane change on a road with “medium” traffic and executed a short distance in front of the police officer’s car justified a traffic stop
- finding an assignment of error grounded in the Sixth Amendment waived when only a hearsay objection was made at trial
- upholding a ruling admitting a video showing a re-creation of shootings that occurred from the trunk of a car
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Justice KINSER, concurring.
Justice AGEE, with whom Justice LACY and Justice KOONTZ join, dissenting in part and concurring in part.
---------------