Opinion

In re Zielyk

  • 229 N.J. 331
  • 162 A.3d 288
  • 2017 N.J. LEXIS 636
  • 2017 WL 2591455
Court
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Filed
Jun 15, 2017
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 16-165, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f)(default by respondent), that ANDREY V. ZIELYK, formerly of PARSIPPANY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 198 6, and who has been *332 temporarily suspended from the practice of law since February 10, 2015, should be censured for violating RPC 8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities) and RPC 8.4(d) (engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANDREY V. ZIELYK is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that ANDREY V. ZIELYK remain suspended from practice pursuant to the Orders of the Court filed February 10, 2015, and September 24, 2015, and until further Order; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.