Opinion

Hinfey v. Matawan Regional Board of Education

  • 147 N.J. Super. 201
  • 371 A.2d 78
  • 1977 N.J. Super. LEXIS 673
Court
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Filed
Jan 21, 1977
Status
Published
Author
Crane
On the bench
Crane, Pressler
Cited by
6 cases

Reversed on other grounds by Hinfey v. Matawan Regional Board of Education, 77 N.J. 514 (1978)

" ‘Where there exists a party having standing to ... take an appeal, we shall not ordinarily inquire as to whether another party on the same side has standing,’ " quoting Board v. Haberlin, 320 Md. 399, 404, 578 A.2d 215, 217 (1990)

How later courts described this case

  • " ‘Where there exists a party having standing to ... take an appeal, we shall not ordinarily inquire as to whether another party on the same side has standing,’ " quoting Board v. Haberlin, 320 Md. 399, 404, 578 A.2d 215, 217 (1990)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Crane, P. J. A. D.,

Temporarily Assigned, concurring. In my judgment the result we reach leaves the Division on Civil Eights and the Commissioner of Education in the unfortunate position of competitors in the area of curriculum management in the public schools.

The Commissioner is vested with the power and duty to supervise all of the schools of the State receiving support from state appropriations. N. J. S. A. 18A:4-23. Jenkins v. Morris Tp. School Dist. and Bd. of Ed., 58 N. J. 483, 494 (1971). The Commissioner is also empowered to hear and determine “all controversies and disputes” arising under the school laws or under the rules of the State Board. N. J. S. A. 18A:6-9. Among the laws he is required to apply in *212 his supervision of the schools is N. J. S. A. 18A:36-20, which prohibits discrimination in courses of study.

The Division on Civil Rights is vested with the duty and power to prevent and eliminate discrimination in places of public accommodation, including any educational institution under the supervision of the State Board of Education or the Commissioner of Education. N. J. S. A. 10:5-1; N. J. S. A. 10:5-6.

A close examination of all the relevant statutory enactments leads to no discernible expression of legislative intention as to which enactment should control. Under those circumstances, I am content to leave resolution of the issue of where jurisdiction should be vested as a matter of sound governmental policy to that branch of government which has the essential responsibility of formulating governmental policy, namely the Legislature. I trust its attention will be called to this anomolous situation in which two independent administrative agencies have concurrent jurisdiction over the same subject matter.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.