Opinion

Dundas v. Erwin

  • 6 La. Ann. 185
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Feb 15, 1851
Status
Published
Author
Peeston
On the bench
Etjstis, Peeston, Pkeston
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Same Case. — On a Re-Hearing.

THE judgment of the court, on an application for a re-hearing, was pronounced by

Peeston, J.

A re-heating having been prayed for by the defendants and appellees in this case, and the counsel for the plaintiffs consenting thereto; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment entered by this court in this cause on the 23d of December, 1850, be so amended as to read as follows : And that said plaintiffs, James Dundas, Mordecai D. Lewis, Samuel W. Jones, and Robert L. Pitjield, and Robert Iioioell, assignees and trustees of the Bank of the United States, recovor of and from the defendants, James Erwin, Yeatman, Woods Sf Co., and the partners of said firm, James Woods, Robert Woods, and Andrew Erwin, trustee for John and Jane Bell, in solido, the sum of fourteen thousand dollars, with eight per cent per annum interest thereon from 22d day of March, 1848, and costs in both courts. And it is further ox’dered and decreed that the re-hearing prayed for in this case be refused.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.