Opinion

Shipp v. Bordelon

  • 152 La. 795
  • 94 So. 399
  • 1922 La. LEXIS 2421
Court
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Filed
Oct 30, 1922
Status
Published
On the bench
Dawkins, Whole
Cited by
63 cases

The opinion

On Application for Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

In the application for rehearing, it has been called to our attention that we erroneously stated that the building upon which the work was being done was situated on defendant’s farm; whereas, as a matter of fact, it was in the' city of Alexandria. This was due to the fact that there was practically no dispute as to the facts, and the author of the 'opinion confused the facts with those in one of the cases cited. However, this makes no difference in the result, for the defendant in no event was engaged, as a trade, business, or occupation, in building, erecting or repairing houses.

The rehearing is therefore refused.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.