Opinion
The opinion
CRNIELL, J.,
concurs in the opinion that this is not a suit against the state, but is of the opinion that the entire strip of land 120 feet wide above the canal was dedicated to public use for a state highway, and that the statutes purporting to authorize the board of control to lease the part not necessary for the canal or shell road are unconstitutional.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.
A word about cookies
We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.