Opinion

Pugach v. First Department Disciplinary Committee

  • 34 F. App'x 30
Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Filed
May 14, 2002
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

This cause came on to be heard on the record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and was argued by plaintiff pro se and by counsel for defendants.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is now hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of said District Court be and it hereby is affirmed.

Plaintiffs claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging his disbarment is barred under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, is untimely, and lacks merit substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Trager’s Memorandum and Order dated August 22, 2001. Plaintiffs claim of unauthorized computer access in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1030 is without merit in light of the statutory exception for the “lawfully authorized investigative ... activity of a law enforcement agency.” 18 U.S.C. § 1030 (f).

We have considered all of plaintiffs contentions on this appeal and have found in them no basis for reversal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.