Opinion

Robert Lee Brown v. Division of Social Services, City of Lynchburg, Virginia

  • 74 F.3d 1230
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 39011
  • 1996 WL 26827
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jan 24, 1996
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

74 F.3d 1230

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert Lee BROWN, Plaintiff--Appellant,

v.

DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, City of Lynchburg, Virginia,

Defendant--Appellee.

No. 95-2022.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995

Decided Jan. 24, 1996

Robert Lee Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Phillip Richard Lingafelt, Glenn, Flippin, Feldmann & Darby, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order * denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Brown v. Division of Social Servs., No. CA-94-68-L (W.D.Va. May 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Judgment was entered by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636 (c) (West 1993)

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.