Opinion

James v. State

  • 643 N.E.2d 321
  • 1994 Ind. LEXIS 165
  • 1994 WL 664348
Court
Indiana Supreme Court
Filed
Nov 29, 1994
Status
Published
Author
Debrulersullivan
On the bench
Debruler, Dickson, Givan, Shepard, Sullivan
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 19.1%

providing that a trial court is not required to consider allegations of a defendant’s substance abuse as a mitigating circumstance

How later courts described this case

  • providing that a trial court is not required to consider allegations of a defendant’s substance abuse as a mitigating circumstance

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DeBRULER and SULLIVAN, JJ.,

dissent, would remand for a more specific and detailed sentencing order. Robey v. State (1990), Ind., 555 N.E.2d 145, 150 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.