Opinion

Harbury v. Deutch

244 F.3d 960
345 U.S. App. D.C. 280
2001 WL 333049

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed: Apr 6, 2001
Status: Published
On the bench: Edwards, Garland, Ginsburg, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Sentelle, Tatel, Williams
Cited by: 2 cases
Authority: More cited than 88.6%

The opinion

A statement of Circuit Judge HENDERSON dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Circuit Judge SENTELLE, is attached.

Circuit Judge GARLAND did not participate in this matter.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the *961 petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.