Opinion

Carl Barley v. Keith W. Brown Officer Adams Officer Woodward, and Keith Osborne

  • 59 F.3d 165
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23220
  • 1995 WL 376167
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Jun 26, 1995
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

59 F.3d 165

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Carl BARLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Keith W. BROWN; Officer Adams; Officer Woodward,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

Keith OSBORNE, Defendant.

No. 95-6345.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.

Decided June 26, 1995.

Carl Barley, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Christine Maggard, Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Barley v. Osborne, No. CA-93-484-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 13, 1994 & Feb. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.