Opinion

Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v. Surface Transportation Board

  • 197 F.3d 1165
  • 339 U.S. App. D.C. 90
  • 162 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3059
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 32182
  • 1999 WL 1127429
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Dec 10, 1999
Status
Published
Author
Henderson
On the bench
Edwards, Henderson, Silberman
Cited by
6 cases

reviewing the Board’s application of the Lace Curtain standard

How later courts described this case

  • reviewing the Board’s application of the Lace Curtain standard

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge,

concurring in the judgment:

I concur in the decision to grant the petition for review because the Surface Transportation Board failed to justify its change of course; we have no business, however, speculating on the inner workings or interrelationships of the Executive Branch.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.