holding proper plaintiff’s expert’s testimony that defendant’s railroad crossing was “very inadequately protected”
How later courts described this case
- holding proper plaintiff’s expert’s testimony that defendant’s railroad crossing was “very inadequately protected”
- holding proper plaintiff's expert testimony that defendant's railroad crossing was "very inadequately protected"
- expert may testify to the ultimate issue in the case because the jury is free to reject that opinion
- an expert was allowed to testify whether a railroad crossing was adequately protected
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Mr. Justice Schaefer, also dissenting:
In my opinion the judgment must be reversed because of the error in permitting the plaintiff’s expert witness to testify.