Opinion

Gold v. City of Miami

  • 138 F.3d 886
  • 1998 WL 158495
Court
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Filed
Apr 7, 1998
Status
Published
On the bench
Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Hull, Marcus, Tjoflat
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 45.6%

“[A] police officer, by virtue of his profession or training, is expected to absorb a certain amount of [verbal] abuse without retaliating”

How later courts described this case

  • “[A] police officer, by virtue of his profession or training, is expected to absorb a certain amount of [verbal] abuse without retaliating”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion Sept. 17,1997,11th Cir., 121 F.3d 1442 ).

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), rehearing en banc is DENIED.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.