Opinion

LeMoyne v. Harding

  • 132 Ill. 78
Court
Illinois Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 21, 1890
Status
Published
Author
Wilkin
On the bench
Wilkin
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 51.1%

The opinion

Mr. Justice Wilkin delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is the same case brought up by writ of error to the circuit court of Cook county, between these parties, and decided at the present term. (See LeMoyne v. Harding, ante, p. 23.) Prior to suing out the writ of error in this court, appellant had taken an appeal from the circuit to the Appellate Court. Appellee there moved to dismiss, for want of jurisdiction, on the ground that a freehold was involved. The motion was allowed, and the appeal dismissed. From that judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The bill was for partition, and to set aside a tax deed. The decree appealed from granted the prayer of the bill. A freehold was therefore involved, and decided by the circuit court on two issues. Carter et al. v. Penn, 99 Ill. 390 ; Bangs et al. v. Brown et al. 110 id. 96; Sanford et al. v. Kane, 127 id. 591, and cases cited.

It is also insisted, that if the Appellate Court had no jurisdiction it was error for that court to render judgment against appellant for costs. This point was also decided in Bangs et al. v. Brown et al. supra, adversely to the contention of appellant.

The judgment of the Appellate Court was right.

Judgment affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.