Opinion

Love v. Foster

  • 100 F.3d 413
  • 1996 WL 663225
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Nov 15, 1996
Status
Published
On the bench
Davis, Dennis, Fallon, Politz, Smith
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 46.4%

The opinion

RULING ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before DAVIS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and FALLON 1 District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Treating the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, the Petition for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. Judge Dennis would grant rehearing for reasons stated in his dissent. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor, the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

In response to the petition for rehearing, we make it clear that all we hold is that Louisiana’s election plan, to the extent it *414 precludes any legal election for United States Representatives and Senators on Federal Election Day, conflicts with 2 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 7 and is invalid. Also, we do not suggest that Louisiana may not retain its open primary system. One way it can retain this system and avoid any conflict with the federal statute is to hold the open primary on Federal Election Day and provide for a runoff election between November and January when the elected member of Congress takes office. See 2 U.S.C. § 8 .

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.