Opinion

United Parcel Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

  • 92 F.3d 1221
  • 320 U.S. App. D.C. 80
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Aug 20, 1996
Status
Published
Author
Henderson
On the bench
Henderson, Sentelle, Wald
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge,

concurring:

Because I agree with my colleagues that the NLRB was not required to consult the NMB and that the petitioner is subject to the NLRB’s regulation under the NLRA, I concur. I do so, however, without regard to the question of deference. In my opinion, neither conclusion has anything to do with deference to the agencies involved. We are faced here with a simple jurisdictional question: Does the petitioner perform a “trucking service,” thereby coming within the RLA’s clear and explicit exception. We all agree that it does. .To the extent that our decision rests on our own reading of the statutory language, I am pleased to join it.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.