Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Beswick

  • 104 Or. App. 494
  • 802 P.2d 82
  • 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 1606
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Nov 28, 1990
Status
Published
On the bench
Edmonds, Riggs, Warren
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.5%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Employer seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s decision affirming the referee’s order that granted claimant permanent total disability. We reverse and remand.

Employer contends that the case should be remanded, because the Board failed to make a finding about whether claimant was willing to seek employment. ORS 656.206(3) provides:

“The worker has the burden of proving permanent total disability status and must establish that the worker is willing to seek regular gainful employment and that the worker has made reasonable efforts to obtain such employment.”

In SAIF v. Stephen, 308 Or 41, 48 , 774 P2d 1103 (1989), the Supreme Court held that futility excuses proof of reasonable efforts to gain employment, but proof of willingness to seek work is still required. It remanded the case for a finding on whether the claimant was willing to seek employment. See also SAIF v. Orr, 101 Or App 612 , 792 P2d 454 (1990). Here, the Board found that any efforts by claimant to seek employment would be futile but did not address whether she was willing to seek work. We remand for that determination.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.