Opinion

Rayford L. Burke v. Michael Grant Howard Brown Ken Shawver Robert Warsaw Ralph Bently

  • 52 F.3d 320
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17204
  • 1995 WL 231831
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Filed
Apr 20, 1995
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

52 F.3d 320

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rayford L. BURKE, Plaintiff--Appellant,

v.

Michael GRANT; Howard Brown; Ken Shawver; Robert Warsaw;

Ralph Bently, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7236.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 1995.

Decided April 20, 1995.

Rayford L. Burke, Appellant Pro Se.

Edmund L. Gaines, HOMESLEY, JONES, GAINES & FIELDS, Statesville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burke v. Grant, No. CA-92-39-5-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.