Opinion

Hutchinson v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

  • 81 Or. App. 162
  • 724 P.2d 894
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Sep 10, 1986
Status
Published
Author
Richardson
On the bench
Deits, Newman, Richardson
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 56.0%

The opinion

RICHARDSON, P. J.

Petitioner - cross-respondent requests reconsideration of our decision in this case, 80 Or App 276 , 720 P2d 1350 (1986), pursuant to ORAP 10.10. We allow the petition, modify our decision and affirm it as modified.

On review, petitioner contended that the Workers’ Compensation Board erred in denying penalties and attorney fees which he requested because of SAIF’s late denial of his workers’ compensation claim. ORS 656.262(10). We affirmed the Board’s decision without opinion. Petitioner points out that, under Spivey v. SAIF, 79 Or App 568 , 720 P2d 755 (1986), he is entitled to attorney fees. He is not entitled to a penalty for the tardy denial, because there was no compensation then due on which to base a penalty. He is, however, entitled to attorney fees. Spivey v. SAIF, supra.

Reconsideration allowed; reversed and remanded for determination of attorney fees; otherwise affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.