“[T]he issue is whether the evidence should be excluded because the flaw is large enough that the expert lacks good grounds for his or her conclusions.”
How later courts described this case
- “[T]he issue is whether the evidence should be excluded because the flaw is large enough that the expert lacks good grounds for his or her conclusions.”
- “Materiality is for the court, state of mind is for the jury.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING
In Nos. 92-1995, 92-1996, 92-1997, 92-1999, 92-2000, 92-2010, 92-2011, 92-2014 and 92-2016.
Oct. 14, 1994
The petition for rehearing filed by Appellants, having been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this court and no judge who concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.