Opinion

Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission

  • 329 F.2d 223
  • 51 P.U.R.3d 70
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Oct 17, 1963
Status
Published
Author
Fahy
On the bench
Burger, Fahy, Prettyman
Cited by
6 cases
Authority
More cited than 16.9%

The opinion

FAHY, Circuit Judge

(concurs in the result).

I agree that Section 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act does not authorize this court to review evidentiary rulings of the Commission in an interlocutory manner independent of the provisions of that section governing the jurisdiction of this court. Cf. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 116 U.S.App.D.C. 249 , 322 F.2d 999 (1963). I do not read Consolidated Edison Co. v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197 , 59 S.Ct. *229 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938), decided under the provisions governing review of orders of the Labor Board, as in any manner inconsistent with this position.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.