Opinion

Conner v. Pennsylvania R.

  • 177 F.2d 854
  • 85 U.S. App. D.C. 233
  • 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2570
  • 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3300
Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Filed
Aug 1, 1949
Status
Published
On the bench
Clark, Miller, Prettyman
Cited by
15 cases

The opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

Appellants say that nowhere in the proceedings prior to the opinion of this court was the right to damages raised or argued. The complaint asserted a claim alternatively in the event that the court should adjudge' lawful the action of the Railroad in transferring the defendants from the freight list to the passenger list. The District Court and this court did so adjudge. The alternative claim was in two parts, (1) an asserted right of appellants to an opportunity to transfer to the freight list and (2) damages, the amount of which was to be shown by an accounting. This court passed upon the alternative claim, approving it in one part and denying it in the other.

Appellants’ other present points were fully discussesd in the original briefs and argument.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.