Opinion

State v. Lord

  • 31 L.R.A. 473
  • 28 Or. 498
  • 43 P. 471
  • 1896 Ore. LEXIS 98
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Jan 27, 1896
Status
Published
On the bench
Pinney, Wolverton
Cited by
49 cases

illegal conduct by public officials affecting public rights

How later courts described this case

  • illegal conduct by public officials affecting public rights

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Since delivering the opinion in this case, an elaborate petition for rehearing has been filed. We have carefully examined it, and, while some of the points made at the hearing are presented in a new light and with much force, there is no new question made not considered by us in the former opinion. We see no reason for changing the conclusions then reached, hence a rehearing is denied.

Rehearing denied.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.