Opinion

McLeod v. Scott

  • 21 Or. 94
  • 29 P. 1
  • 1891 Ore. LEXIS 19
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Jun 24, 1891
Status
Published
On the bench
Boise, County, Steahan
Cited by
28 cases

circuit court issued alternative writ; this court initially reviewed petition and supporting documentation to determine sufficiency of factual allegations, but, on rehearing, clarified that it was limited to examining alternative writ, not petition

How later courts described this case

  • circuit court issued alternative writ; this court initially reviewed petition and supporting documentation to determine sufficiency of factual allegations, but, on rehearing, clarified that it was limited to examining alternative writ, not petition

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

On ReheakiNG-.

Per Curiam.

The petition is no part of the pleadings. (Hill’s Code, § 600.) This being so, the writ must be sufficient in itself to show what is claimed and the facts upon which the claim is made. It stands for the complaint, and may be demurred to or answered in the same manner as to a complaint in an action. (Hill’s Code, §§ 598, 599.) That *112 the writ is wanting in material allegations to support the proceeding is not questioned; and upon reconsideration, we do not think it can be aided by reference to the facts in the petition. As a consequence, there was no error in the court below in dismissing the proceeding although for different reasons, and the judgment must be affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.